data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b79ea/b79ea37920641e621e1a4e51d1e10aea95ace669" alt="Logitech g910 profile"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/695fd/695fd570b4bb21adb5d9eb2a31fee9651ff4c87e" alt="logitech g910 profile logitech g910 profile"
My interpretation of all of this along with other reviews is that you can make AL as fast as you want or as efficient as you want, and you can win or tie on the other metric, which is effectively a clean sweep as far as AL vs Zen 3. Results are I'm sure totally valid for the configured systems but few bother to actually read the test setup. In their gaming benchmarks it's effectively a tie between AL and Zen 3, except that AL still wins 1% lows in that setup. At the same time putting Zen 3 in the worst light for efficiency. Of course this puts Zen 3 in the best light for performance (running 3800 1:1 IF 1900) and AL in the worst light for performance. Also running Gear 2 will make AL even more efficient Meaning, it is 1:2ĭDR4 on AL seems to pull more power, DDR5 is more efficient so its saving power there. That's like the 1% for IF.īy contrast he must've lost the DDR5 lotto as he is running it in Gear 2 on Alder Lake. In the gaming benchmarks there, the AMD boxes are running DDR4-3800 1:1 meaning IF is 1900. It's kind of funny how much flack the AMD crowd has given, and failed to look at that site.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b79ea/b79ea37920641e621e1a4e51d1e10aea95ace669" alt="Logitech g910 profile"